Rodinal 1+50 (not 1+25). Agitation for the first minute, then 3 times every minute. I was surprised too, lots of sharpness, the grain is acceptable, of course this is a 120 negative (6×7cm), at a small enlargement.
How many minutes? Sharpness doesn’t surprise me, those lenses are great, but I’m surprised at the lack of grain, considering it’s rodinal and not even stand development!
Rodinal stand development or with agitation?
He’ll be a great Sinterklaas for his wee brother ;)
Comment by Eva — December 3, 2009 @ 4:00 pm
Rodinal 1+50 (not 1+25). Agitation for the first minute, then 3 times every minute. I was surprised too, lots of sharpness, the grain is acceptable, of course this is a 120 negative (6×7cm), at a small enlargement.
Comment by Edward van Herk — December 3, 2009 @ 8:25 pm
How many minutes? Sharpness doesn’t surprise me, those lenses are great, but I’m surprised at the lack of grain, considering it’s rodinal and not even stand development!
Rijk’s pose, I can see you in him..
Comment by Eva — December 4, 2009 @ 7:04 pm
Eva, 13.5 minutes. Of course it’s a small print of a big negative. I had never used rodinal before, 1+25 is maybe more grain, 1+50 is very reasonable.
Comment by Edward van Herk — December 4, 2009 @ 11:54 pm
Can you make the background of this site black? You’ll can see your photo more comfortably…
Comment by Igor — December 16, 2009 @ 6:10 am
thanks Igor, but I prefer to keep it light.
Comment by Edward van Herk — December 16, 2009 @ 10:11 am
This is really cute :)
Comment by Toni — January 17, 2010 @ 3:27 pm